ArticleBritish paramedic journal2025
Venous blood point-of-care testing (POCT) for paramedics in urgent and emergency care: a single-site feasibility study (POCTPara).
Article in British paramedic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of qualitative and mixed methods research in diagnostic technology evaluation and implementation: insights from a systematic review.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Paramedics play an important role in addressing the growing demands in urgent and emergency care. Point-of-care testing (POCT) devices are increasingly portable and may assist with appropriate non-conveyance, but limited research exists to support this. This feasibility study aimed to inform the design of a larger study to determine whether it is practical for paramedics to use blood analysis POCT. Methods: An eight-month single-site feasibility sequential explanatory mixed-method study was conducted between April and December 2023, with a team of specialist paramedics who were provided with Abbott® Results: Seven specialist paramedics were recruited; 287 patients were screened, of which 252 (88%) were excluded and 35 (12%) were recruited. Lack of mental capacity excluded 76% of cases. The mean age was 82 years; 40% of participants were female and 60% were male. Hospital conveyance rates were four (11%) of the recruited patients. In those recruited and not conveyed, the median time on scene was 120 minutes. The success rate to obtain a test result at the first attempt was 81% (CHEM8+) and 84% (CG4+). Test result failure rates were 13% (CHEM8+) and 3% (CG4+). Focus group data revealed that paramedic participants considered POCT useful for decision making and the device procedures to be acceptable. Paramedics reported that extended time on scene was related to trial procedures and waiting times to discuss test results with healthcare professionals. Conclusion: The POCT devices were acceptable and practical for use by our specialist paramedic participants. The results of this feasibility study should inform the design of a larger study to test the impact of using POCT, to understand challenges in recruitment and retention where POCT is utilised and to determine the clinical presentations where POCT can be applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.