Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132383›Full record

ReviewPain reports2025

Empathy and validation in chronic pain couples: a systematic review.

Karolin Teichmüller, Hripsime Galstyan, Lisa M Bas, Gudrun Kindl, Philipp Kanske, Heike L Rittner, Andrea M F Reiter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karolin TeichmüllerDepartment of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5905-6304
Hripsime GalstyanDepartment of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Lisa M BasDepartment of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Gudrun KindlDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Centre for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Philipp KanskeFaculty of Psychology, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Heike L RittnerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Centre for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Andrea M F ReiterDepartment of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain is significantly influenced by social interactions, especially within close relationships. However, it is unclear how exactly partner responses such as solicitousness or empathy, affect pain-related and relationship outcomes. In October 2024 and July 2025, we systematically searched APA PsycInfo, Web of Science, and PubMed for studies assessing the impact of empathic or validating behavior on pain-related and relationship outcomes in adult romantic couples with at least 1 chronic pain patient. Eleven studies (4 on the same sample) were included, with sample sizes between 8 and 145 couples. In most studies, participants' mean age was older than 50 years. The most common pain condition was painful knee osteoarthritis, followed by other musculoskeletal issues. The Risk of Bias Utilized for Surveys Tool revealed a moderate risk of bias in the included studies. Four studies found a positive impact of empathy on pain-related outcomes, particularly physical functionality. No study reported adverse effects of solicitousness on pain or functioning. Four studies revealed positive effects of empathy on relationship outcomes, eg, a buffering effect of empathy on the association between depressive symptoms and marital quality. A largely consistent result was the detrimental impact of invalidation. However, some studies reported nonsignificant or partially contradictory findings, especially in male patient couples. These results largely align with Intimacy and Coping Theories and highlight the beneficial function of empathy and validation in chronic pain. However, variability in the definition and measurement of empathy complicates comparisons. In clinical practice, promoting spousal empathy and reducing invalidation could enhance pain management.

Indexed as

Chronic painInvalidationMarital interactionNoncancer painSpouses

Identifiers

PMID41132383
PMCPMC12543237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.