Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132358›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025

Long-term follow-up after initial negative prostate biopsy-comparison of conventional transrectal ultrasound biopsy and mpMRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion guided biopsy.

Thomas Paul Scherer, Karim Alshazly, Basil Kaufmann, Uwe Bieri, Florian Alexander Schmid, Marian Severin Wettstein, Karim Saba, Ashkan Mortezavi, Daniel Eberli, Cédric Poyet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas Paul SchererDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5544-1063
Karim AlshazlyDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Basil KaufmannDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Uwe BieriDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Florian Alexander SchmidDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marian Severin WettsteinDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Karim SabaUrology Center, Hirslanden Klinik Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Ashkan MortezaviDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniel EberliDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Cédric PoyetDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Men after an initial negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy have a low risk of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and mortality during follow-up. It is unknown whether an initial negative multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided biopsy is associated with the same risk of PCa diagnosis and mortality during follow-up. The present study aimed to describe the risk differences of developing localized, metastatic or deadly PCa after either a negative TRUS or mpMRI-guided prostate biopsy. Methods: Men after an initial negative prostate biopsy at our institution between 2005-2021 were retrospectively identified and divided into two groups, whether they received an mpMRI prior to the biopsy [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) group] or not (no MRI group). Categorical and continuous variables were compared by Results: A total of 1,308 men underwent an initial negative prostate biopsy (84% TRUS; 16% MRI). Re-biopsies were significantly more often performed in the no MRI group (P value <0.001). The incidence rate (IR) of PCa (grade group ≥2) were 9.8 per 1,000 person-years (py) in the no MRI group and 11.9 per 1,000 py in the MRI group (P value =0.50). No metastasis or PCa specific deaths were recorded in the MRI group, whereas the IR were 1.19 and 0.17 per 1,000 py in the no MRI group. Conclusions: Men with an initial negative biopsy have a low risk of developing localized, metastatic, or deadly PCa during long-term follow-up. The biopsy technique was not significantly associated with different IRs of significant PCa diagnoses. The event rates of metastasis and PCa-specific deaths were too rare to draw any conclusions.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)mortalityMRI fusion biopsyProstate biopsyprostate cancer (PCa)

Identifiers

PMID41132358
PMCPMC12541502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.