ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025
Risky business: penile prosthesis in high-risk patients.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with diabetes and other immunocompromising conditions may be at higher risk for penile prosthesis complications. However, data on this patient population is limited and at times contradictory. We review our operative and post-operative experience with inflatable penile prosthesis placement in these high-risk patients at a major urban tertiary-care center. We hypothesize that peri-operative hyperglycemia may increase the likelihood of postoperative complications and that a peri-operative glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) greater than 8.5 may be associated with higher rates of device infection, erosion, and malfunction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing penile prosthesis insertion at a single institution from 2012-2023. We recorded peri-operative HbA1c in addition to mean and maximum peri-operative blood glucose levels. The primary outcome was device infection leading to reoperation. Secondary outcomes included device erosion or device component malfunction. Results: Two hundred and thirty-five cases among 200 patients met inclusion criteria. 179 were first-time implants with 56 revision surgeries. Of the 235 surgeries, patients with diabetes underwent 107 surgeries, those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) underwent 6, solid organ transplant history underwent 10, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) underwent 12. The mean patient age was 61.8 years. Perioperative HbA1c was higher among diabetics (7.7 Conclusions: Device-related complications were not more common among diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic counterparts. No differences in rates of device infection, device malfunction, or device erosion were noted in our findings. Furthermore, a preoperative HbA1c cutoff of 8.5 and 10 g/dL was not associated with an increased rate of prosthetic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.