Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132338›Full record

ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025

First-in-human study of DGPR1008 for intraoperative fluorescence imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Peng Li, Ying Xu, Shijie Yu, Zhijun Miao, Hongbo Xu, Bing Lu, Shoujun Zhou, Wenjuan Gan, Felip Couñago, Kalevi Kairemo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Peng Li *Department of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital), Suzhou, China.
Ying Xu *SIGNDO Biotechnology Laboratories, Suzhou, China.
Shijie Yu *Department of Pathology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital), Suzhou, China.
Zhijun MiaoDepartment of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital), Suzhou, China.
Hongbo XuDepartment of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital), Suzhou, China.
Bing LuDepartment of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital), Suzhou, China.
Shoujun ZhouDepartment of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital), Suzhou, China.
Wenjuan GanDepartment of Pathology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital), Suzhou, China.
Felip CouñagoRadiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario San Francisco, Madrid, Spain.
Kalevi KairemoDepartments of Molecular Radiotherapy & Nuclear Medicine, Docrates Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Panagiotis J VlachostergiosDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Jing ZhaoSIGNDO Biotechnology Laboratories, Suzhou, China.
Jinxian PuDepartment of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital), Suzhou, China.
Gang ShenDepartment of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital), Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) precise surgical resection remains a critical challenge due to positive margins compromising outcomes. This study sought to explore the safety and efficacy of DGPR1008, a novel near-infrared (NIR) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted fluorescent contrast agent, in fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) of PCa. Methods: This single-center, open-label, prospective, single-arm, exploratory study was carried out in The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, China. Patients newly diagnosed with PCa (a Gleason score ≥7) were eligible for enrollment. All patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) using DGPR1008. Four dose cohorts were studied: dose cohort A, which received 0.06 mg/kg of DGPR1008 24 h preoperatively; dose cohort B, which received 0.03 mg/kg of DGPR1008 24 h preoperatively; dose cohort C, which received 0.03 mg/kg of DGPR1008 12 h preoperatively, and dose cohort D, which received 0.045 mg/kg of DGPR1008 24 h preoperatively. Safety and efficacy were assessed. Results: From July, 2023 to January, 2024, 14 eligible patients were included in the study. In total, 32 adverse events (AEs) were observed. One patient (7.1%) presented with four serious adverse events (SAEs), including urinary fistula, infected lymphocele, wound complications, and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. None of the AEs or SAEs was found to be associated with the administration of DGPR1008. Compared with the other dose cohorts, DGPR1008 showed the highest sensitivity (80.6%) for detecting PCa Conclusions: DGPR1008 is safe and well tolerated, and may be used in the intraoperative identification of primary PCa and positive surgical margins. Dose cohort B (0.03 mg/kg, 24 h preoperatively) is optimal for efficacy and TBR.

Indexed as

Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS)intraoperative imagingprostate cancer (PCa)prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)radical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID41132338
PMCPMC12541503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.