Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132177›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Construction of community home-based older adult care service model based on modular design concept.

Xiaohua Zhou, Lina Chen, Xu Lou, Ying Li, Bobo Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaohua ZhouSchool of Nursing, Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Lina ChenSchool of Nursing, Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Xu LouSchool of Nursing, Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Ying LiSchool of Nursing, Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Bobo HanSchool of Nursing, Dalian University, Dalian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectvie: To address the supply-demand mismatch in community home-based older adult care services amid China's deepening aging population crisis. Methods: This study employs a modular design concept, selecting Liaoning Province-the region with the nation's highest aging rate-as the research area. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 331 community-dwelling older adults, and multiple linear regression analysis was applied to identify factors influencing care service demands. Results: Key findings include: (1) Older adult' demands manifest a five-dimensional structure (life assistance, medical care, spiritual/cultural engagement, rights protection, and age-friendly modifications), with spiritual/cultural engagement (score rate: 68.40%) and age-friendly modifications (67.67%) being the most urgent needs. (2) Subgroups including advanced age (≥71 years), disabled, living alone, highly educated, and chronic disease individuals exhibited significantly higher demand intensity ( Conclusion: Centered on community residents' committees (CRCs) as coordination hubs, this model enables dynamic monitoring and optimization through the Demand-Service Matching Index (DSMI), offering an actionable solution to reconcile fragmented resources and heterogeneous demands, thereby supporting both older adults and their caregivers in regional older adult care systems.

Indexed as

Health Services for the AgedHealth Services Needs and DemandHome Care ServicesAgedAged, 80 and overChinaFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairescaregiver supportcommunity home-based older adult care servicedemandmodel constructionmodularsupply

Identifiers

PMID41132177
PMCPMC12540075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.