ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
MEGA-RAG: a retrieval-augmented generation framework with multi-evidence guided answer refinement for mitigating hallucinations of LLMs in public health.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease Care: Selected Applications in Tuberculosis, Sepsis, and Antimicrobial Stewardship.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Tool to Agent: A Semi-Systematic Review of Human-AI Alignment and a Proposed Tiered Healing Ecosystem for Mental Health.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An evidence-weighted knowledge framework with path-aware reasoning for personalized lifestyle management in chronic disease.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Confident but unsupported: auditing large language models against supplied evidence boundaries in drug-induced liver injury assessment.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Large language models in patient education for brain tumors: opportunities, risks, and ethical considerations.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Toward clinical integration of generative AI in mental health: personalization, multimodality and inter-entity experience.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The increasing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in public health has raised significant concerns about hallucinations-factually inaccurate or misleading outputs that can compromise clinical communication and policy decisions. Methods: We propose a retrieval-augmented generation framework with multi-evidence guided answer refinement (MEGA-RAG), specifically designed to mitigate hallucinations in public health applications. The framework integrates multi-source evidence retrieval (dense retrieval via FAISS, keyword-based retrieval via BM25, and biomedical knowledge graphs), employs a cross-encoder reranker to ensure semantic relevance, and incorporates a discrepancy-aware refinement module to further enhance factual accuracy. Results: Experimental evaluation demonstrates that MEGA-RAG outperforms four baseline models [PubMedBERT, PubMedGPT, standalone LLM, and LLM with standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)], achieving a reduction in hallucination rates by over 40%. It also achieves the highest accuracy (0.7913), precision (0.7541), recall (0.8304), and F1 score (0.7904). Discussion: These findings confirm that MEGA-RAG is highly effective in generating factually reliable and medically accurate responses, thereby enhancing the credibility of AI-generated health information for applications in health education, clinical communication, and evidence-based policy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.