Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132167›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Trends and risk factors of bloodborne occupational exposure among healthcare workers in a Chinese tertiary hospital (2012-2022).

Liyi Wang, Bing Gao, Shentai Li, Tianyuan Guo, Xuhua Cao, Mengsha Zhao, Yating Wang, Yan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Liyi WangSecond Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Bing GaoSecond Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Shentai LiSecond Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Tianyuan GuoSecond Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xuhua CaoSecond Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Mengsha ZhaoHebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yating WangSecond Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yan LiuSecond Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics and long-term trends of bloodborne occupational exposure (BOE) among healthcare workers (HCWs) in a tertiary hospital in China from 2012 to 2022 (11 years) and evaluate BOE-associated factors during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A total of 1,725 self-reported cases of BOE were analyzed. The study comprised: (1) Descriptive analysis of demographic and professional variables; (2) Trend analysis of exposure events by season, month, sex, age, professional role, department, exposure source and occupational factors; and (3) Logistic regression analysis, with BOEs during the COVID-19 pandemic as the dependent variable. Results: BOEs were most prevalent among female, formally employed staff, nurses, 25-year-olds, those with 1-5 years of experience, and junior-title holders. High-risk settings included the neurosurgery department and wards; common exposure types were needlestick injuries (mostly to ungloved hands) and first-time exposures. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the primary exposure source, with most exposed individuals having a prior HBV vaccination history. Exposure frequency peaked in December and the fourth quarter of the year. (1) Longitudinal trends showed rising BOE incidence in December, spring, and among specific groups: females, 25-year-olds, hospital doctors (including postgraduate/doctoral trainees), nurses (including interns), and staff with 10-15 years of experience. Syphilis/suspected syphilis-related exposures also demonstrated an upward trend. (2) Logistic regression identified exposure month, occupation, length of service as independent factors associated with BOE during the COVID-19 pandemic ( Conclusion: Targeted prevention and control strategies that focus on high-risk personnel, clinical departments, and specific procedures are essential to reduce the incidence of BOE among healthcare workers. Particular attention is required during public health emergencies (e.g., the COVID-19 pandemic), especially in addressing the January exposure peak, protecting physicians and mid-career staff with 16-20 years of service, and establishing cross-institutional mechanisms for coordinated BOE reporting and follow-up of support staff, in order to further minimize occupational risks. In addition, preventive measures such as targeted training programs, simulation-based exercises, and routine monitoring of HBV immunization status should be systematically implemented for trainees and newly recruited personnel.

Indexed as

Blood-Borne InfectionsBlood-Borne PathogensCOVID-19Health PersonnelOccupational ExposureTertiary Care CentersAdultChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeedlestick InjuriesRisk Factorsbloodborne occupational exposureCOVID-19 pandemichealthcare workerslong-term trendsoccupational compositionprofessional title

Identifiers

PMID41132167
PMCPMC12540332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.