Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132117›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

The Use of Community Engagement in Implementation: Successes and Challenges From the Implementation and Adaptation of Bundled HIV Interventions for Black Women.

Linda Sprague Martinez, Melanie Rocco, Judith C Scott, Alex Bergson, Madison Kitchen, Andrea Dakin, Masill Miranda, Alicia Downes, Serena Rajabiun, Angela Wangari Walter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Linda Sprague MartinezHealth Disparities Institute, UConn Health, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5070-7640
Melanie RoccoHealth Disparities Institute, UConn Health, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-4787-731X
Judith C ScottBoston University School of Social Work, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1561-9354
Alex BergsonBoston University School of Social Work, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Madison KitchenBoston University School of Social Work, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Andrea DakinAIDS Foundation of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Masill MirandaAIDS United, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Alicia DownesAIDS United, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Serena RajabiunDepartment of Public Health, Zuckerberg College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8770-5764
Angela Wangari WalterDepartment of Public Health, Zuckerberg College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

This study is funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) grant U90HA39727.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBlack women are disproportionately impacted by HIV in the United States, yet Black women are rarely called upon to engage in intervention development, implementation and evaluation. As a result, interventions continuously fail to reflect their priorities and needs. Incorporating the meaningful involvement of Black women with HIV and community organisations that serve them into implementation processes is necessary if interventions are going to be effective and sustained. The purpose of this paper is to examine the implementation strategies that employed community engagement to support the adaptation and uptake of bundled interventions to improve care and treatment outcomes for Black women with HIV as part of the Black Women First initiative. Successes and challenges in the use of community engagement in implementation are also explored.

methodsFor this paper, we draw on qualitative implementation data collected over the course of the Black Women First initiative from 12 demonstration sites. Data-related community engagement, patient, client, consumer engagement, implementation and challenges to engagement were extracted and analysed using directed content analysis.

resultsWe identified five types of community engagement used by sites in implementation: client advisory boards, client focus groups and surveys, peer leadership, community taskforces, and network weaving. They engaged site clients who were Black women with HIV, community members and partner organisations to inform pre-implementation design, adaptation of intervention design and delivery, and intervention and programme sustainability planning. The frequency of use of these different types of community engagement varied across sites and the project period. Maintaining engagement and quality of involvement in implementation across the different types of community engagement were key challenges for sites, especially in advisory boards and focus groups.

conclusionResearchers and HIV care practitioners should continue to utilise community engagement to enhance intervention implementation, as well as identify emergent ways to engage community members and organisations to enhance implementation and health outcomes for people with HIV. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Black Women First initiative demonstration site staff who were integral to the implementation of the bundled interventions for Black women with HIV were involved in the analysis and interpretation of the data, and preparation of this manuscript.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanCommunity ParticipationHIV InfectionsFemaleHumansQualitative ResearchUnited StatesWhitecommunity engagementHIV careHIV interventionimplementation

Identifiers

PMID41132117
PMCPMC12550397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.