ArticleAnimal bioscience2026
Effects of cooking technique and meat cut on the physical and thermal characteristics of camel (Camelus dromedarius) meat.
Article in Animal bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of cooking methods (COMs) and meat cuts (MTCs) on the physical and thermal characteristics of camel (Camelus dromedarius) meat.
methodsThirty-two samples from shoulder and round cuts of eight male Majaheem breed animals were prepared using three COMs: sous vide, electric oven, and pressure cooker.
resultsCOM had significantly influence on pH, water activity, cooking loss, density, and all color parameters (L*, a*, b*, chroma, hue). MTC significantly affected pH, water activity, cooking loss, and lightness (L*). Both factors significantly impacted specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and thermal diffusivity, while thermal resistance was unaffected by MTC. Significant interaction effects (COM×MTC) occurred for pH, thermal diffusivity, and all color parameters except chroma. Sous vide cooking demonstrated superior tenderness and moisture retention compared to electric oven and pressure cooker methods. It effectively preserved natural color attributes, resulting in enhanced lightness (L*), redness (a*), and chroma due to its uniform heating process. This controlled heat distribution minimized moisture loss and improved the meat's ability to absorb heat, as indicated by elevated specific heat values. These properties contributed to enhanced texture preservation and overall meat quality.
conclusionThe findings suggest that adopting sous vide could optimize the cooking of camel meat, enhancing its visual appeal and consumer satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.