ArticleAnimal bioscience2026
Fecal microbiome associated with egg production efficiency in laying hens.
Article in Animal bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to characterize the fecal microbiome of highly productive laying hens to identify microbial signatures linked with enhanced egg production performance.
methodsSix commercial layer farms were enrolled in the study. Farms with an average monthly egg production rate (amEPR) above 80% over six consecutive months were classified as the high-production group (D group; n = 3), while those with amEPR below 60% were designated as the low-production group (P group; n = 3). All hens were raised in open-type housing systems without a history of forced molting. From each farm, 36 fecal samples were randomly collected and subjected to full-length 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing to characterize the microbiome.
resultsThe D group showed significantly higher Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratios (p<0.001) and lower species richness (Menhinick index, p<0.05) compared with the P group. Multivariate analyses (Adonis, ANOSIM, and MRPP; all p<0.001) revealed distinct microbial community structures between the groups. Taxonomic profiling indicated that the D group harbored higher relative abundances of Enterococcus cecorum and Lactobacillus kitasatonis (both p<0.05). In contrast, the P group had elevated levels of Bacteroides eggerthii and Bacteroides coprosuis (p<0.001 and p<0.05, respectively). Principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis effect size further identified Enterococcus cecorum and Lactobacillus kitasatonis as biomarkers associated with superior egg production. In Hy-Line hens, Lactobacillus gallinarum and Lactobacillus salivarius were also identified as biomarkers linked to high productivity.
conclusionThe fecal microbiome of highly productive laying hens is characterized by an enrichment of Enterococcus cecorum and lactic acid bacteria, particularly Lactobacillus kitasatonis, Lactobacillus gallinarum, and Lactobacillus salivarius. Their targeted supplementation may represent a promising probiotic strategy to improve egg production efficiency in commercial laying hens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.