Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41132010›Full record

SynthesisVeterinary medicine and science2025

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Prevalence of Brucella melitensis in Sheep and Goat.

Seemanta Das, Pronab Das, Ankon Das, F M Yasir Hasib, Sharmin Chowdhury

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seemanta DasOne Health Institute, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3915-9011
Pronab DasOne Health Institute, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2407-2518
Ankon DasDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1966-3085
F M Yasir HasibDepartment of Pathology and Parasitology, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6662-7725
Sharmin ChowdhuryDepartment of Pathology and Parasitology, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8031-5998

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucellosis is one of the neglected zoonotic diseases (NZD) in the world that causes disease globally. Brucella melitensis, one of the organisms responsible for causing the disease in sheep and goat, is responsible for the disease in humans. The disease is transmitted mainly from sheep and goat to humans via ingestion (typically through milk), inhalation, abrasion and so on. Despite the zoonotic importance of the disease, there is lack of comprehensive data such as overall prevalence around the world is yet to be measured. The aim of this study is to review all the available articles on the prevalence of the infection in sheep and goats systematically and determine the overall prevalence around the world. Therefore, a literature search was conducted in PubMed for articles published from January 2010 to December 2023 on the relevant topic. The inclusion criteria were set to extract relevant data from the selected articles. A random effect meta-analysis model was used in analysing the data. The derived prevalence was presented in percentage along with 95% confidence interval (CI). The pooled prevalence of B. melitensis infection globally in goat was 2.46% (95% CI: 1.70%-3.21%) and in sheep was 8.07% (95% CI: 6.36%-9.78%); the combined pooled prevalence in both sheep and goat was 5.54% (95% CI: 4.63%-6.45%). Overall, on the basis of regions, the pooled prevalence in goat ranged from 0.07% (95% CI: -0.08% to 0.22%) to 16.82% (95% CI: 12.69%-20.95%). In sheep, the regional pooled prevalence ranged from 0.03% (95% CI: -0.03% to 0.08%) to 60.39% (95% CI: 58.50%-62.27%). This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated the global burden of B. melitensis infection in sheep and goat that would help better understanding the global distribution of the infection and the potential areas of zoonotic transmission. The data have been retrieved from various types of journals with different types of study designs and were analysed to highlight the variation of prevalence across the countries, among different species, diagnostic methods and sample sources. This knowledge would help in planning effective control measures targeting high risk species, areas and so on.

Indexed as

Brucella melitensisBrucellosisGoat DiseasesSheep DiseasesAnimalsGoatsPrevalenceSheepBrucella melitensisbrucellosisgoatsheep

Identifiers

PMID41132010
PMCPMC12550274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.