Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41131929›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2025

Enabling Continuous Intracranial Pressure Monitoring During MRI: A Technical Note on the Development of an MR-Safe Support Frame.

Marcelo P Martins, Malin Ringholm, Jacob Engström, Anders Tisell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcelo P MartinsDepartment of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9928-4207
Malin RingholmClinical Department of Neurosurgery in Linköping, Region Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden.
Jacob EngströmClinical Department of Neurosurgery in Linköping, Region Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden.
Anders TisellCenter for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring during magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is often discontinued due to safety concerns, as commonly used devices are not MR-conditional for in situ operation. Parenchymal probes must be disconnected, and external ventricular drainage (EVD) systems are typically closed or cannot be connected to MR-conditional transducers, thereby limiting diagnostic opportunities in unstable neurocritical care patients. MR examinations in neurocritical care are often deferred-or performed with ICP monitoring paused-because commonly used devices are not MR-conditional for in situ operation: parenchymal probes must be disconnected and EVD systems are typically closed or cannot be connected to MR-conditional transducers. This technical note describes the development of a custom-made, MR-safe support frame that enables continuous ICP monitoring and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage during scanning. The device complies with MR-conditional requirements and allows for hydrostatic levelling to ensure accurate pressure readings. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This innovation may improve MR access for unstable patients by enabling earlier and repeated imaging, potentially allowing for earlier detection of secondary brain injury.

Indexed as

Intracranial PressureMagnetic Resonance ImagingEquipment DesignHumansMonitoring, Physiologiccritical care nursingintracranial pressuremagnetic resonance imagingpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID41131929
PMCPMC12550462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.