ArticleBrain and behavior2025
The Impact of Bulbar and Upper Motor Neuron Involvement on Oculomotor Movement in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Impact of Bulbar and Upper Motor Neuron Involvement on Oculomotor Movement in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by the degeneration of both lower and upper motor neurons (UMN). Clinical heterogeneity manifests in subtypes such as bulbar-onset ALS (bALS) and spinal-onset ALS (sALS), with emerging evidence suggesting that oculomotor dysfunction may reflect broader multisystem involvement. This study aims to investigate oculomotor parameters across different ALS phenotypes and their associations with neuropsychological domains.
methodsA total of 46 patients meeting the Gold Coast Criteria for ALS were enrolled, alongside 23 age- and education-matched healthy controls (HCs). Participants were assessed for demographic variables and clinical features, and underwent cognitive and oculomotor testing using the EyeKnow system. Eye movement performance was compared between groups, and correlations between oculomotor metrics and cognitive and clinical data were examined.
resultsALS patients displayed longer reaction times in anti-saccade tasks (357.48 ± 61.28 ms vs. 316.10 ± 52.70 ms, p = 0.005) and significantly lower predictive saccade accuracy (86.77 ± 19.17% vs. 99.36 ± 2.22%, p < 0.001) compared to HCs. There is no significant difference in the eye movement parameters between sALS and bALS. Patients with bulbar involvement exhibited poorer performance in predictive saccade accuracy (77.53 ± 26.66% vs. 96.01 ± 4.92%, p < 0.001) and longer initial time in the smooth pursuit task (647.43 [402.14, 760.64] ms vs. 452.43 [131.62, 598.20] ms, U = 161.00, p = 0.037) compared to those without bulbar involvement. UMN involvement was associated with poorer performance across prosaccade, anti-saccade, and predictive saccade tasks. No significant correlation between oculomotor metrics and cognitive tests or clinical data was detected.
conclusionsThe findings highlight the impact of bulbar and UMN involvement on oculomotor dysfunction in ALS, demonstrating distinct patterns across various phenotypes. Although oculomotor metrics show sensitivity to the pathophysiology of ALS, their effectiveness as independent biomarkers needs further validation through longitudinal studies that include larger cohorts, advanced neuroimaging techniques, and multimodal assessments to capture the complex interplay between motor, cognitive, and anatomical changes in this varied disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.