ArticleCancer biology & medicine2025
Comprehensive investigation of the molecular basis of cancer dependencies suggests therapeutic options for breast cancer.
Article in Cancer biology & medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLarge-scale CRISPR screens have identified essential genes across cancer cell lines, but links between tumor functional properties and specific dependencies require investigation to reveal the mechanisms underlying dependencies and broaden understanding of targeted therapy.
methodsWe selected 47 breast cancer cell lines from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) with multi-omics data including gene dependency; somatic mutations; copy number alterations; and transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and methylation data. We established a dependency marker association (DMA) analytic pipeline by using linear regression modeling to assess associations between 3,874 representative gene dependencies and multi-omics markers. Additionally, we conducted non-negative matrix factorization clustering, to stratify breast cancer cell lines according to gene dependency features, and investigated cluster-specific DMAs.
resultsWe interpreted valuable DMAs according to two primary aspects. First, dependencies associated with gain-of-function alterations revealed addiction to lactate transporter SLC16A3, thus suggesting a promising therapeutic target. Second, dependencies associated with loss-of-function alterations included synthetic lethality (SL), collateral SL, and prioritized metabolic SL, encompassing paralog SL (e.g., IMPDH1 and IMPDH2), single pathway SL (e.g., GFPT1 and UAP1), and alternative pathway SL (e.g., GPI and PGD). DMA analysis of the two clusters with divergent dependency signatures demonstrated that cluster1 cell lines exhibited extensive metabolism with mitochondrial protein dependencies, whereas cluster2 displays enhanced cell signaling, and reliance on DNA replication and membrane organelle regulators.
conclusionsWe established a DMA analysis pipeline linking the gene dependencies of breast cancer cell lines to multi-omics characteristics, thus elucidating the underpinnings of tumor dependencies and offering a valuable resource for developing novel precision treatment strategies incorporating relevant markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.