ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2026
Comparison of oncologic outcome of preoveratively presumed low-risk endometrial cancer patients who underwent only bilateral pelvic sentinel lymph node (SLN) removal and those who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy in addition to bilateral pelvic SLN removal: Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group (TRSGO-SLN-009).
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of patients with bilateral sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) detection and removed with those who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLA) in addition to bilateral SLNs removal.
methodsThis multicenter, retrospective study included cases of endometrioid type, grade I-II endometrial cancer, in which bilateral SLNs were detected and removed. Patients who had only bilateral SLNs detected and removed (group I) and patients who had bilateral SLNs detected and removed and subsequent additional bilateral PLA (group II) were included in the evaluation.
resultsIn group I (n=216), SLN metastasis rate was 5.5% and in group II (n=251), it was 10.3%. The low-volume disease detection rate was 4.6% in group I and 4.8% in group II. In group II, in patients with SLN macrometastasis had also 28.6% non-SLN macrometastasis. No false-negative results occurred in group II. Recurrence was detected 1.8% in group I and 5% in group II; however, there was no significant difference (p=0.083). Disease-free survival and overall survival, were almost same between the groups (hazard ratio [HR]=2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.681-6.588; p=0.187) and (HR=1.531; 95% CI=0.392-5.975; p=0.537), respectively.
conclusionSLN mapping, ultrastaging, and immunohistochemical staining can identify low-volume metastases that may not be identified with classic lymphadenectomy and hematoxylin & eosin staining. It has been observed that adding PLA beyond SLN mapping did not provide an additional positive contribution to survival. For endometriod type grade I-II patients, detection of bilateral SLNs in both hemipelvis only, if detectable, is an adequate approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.