ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Scalable inference and identifiability of kinetic parameters for transcriptional bursting from single cell data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptional Bursting in Pluripotent Stem Cells.Biology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationStochastic gene expression and cell-to-cell heterogeneity have attracted increased interest in recent years, enabled by advances in single-cell measurement technologies. These studies are also increasingly complemented by quantitative biophysical modeling, often using the framework of stochastic biochemical kinetic models. However, inferring parameters for such models (i.e., the kinetic rates of biochemical reactions) remains a technical and computational challenge, particularly doing so in a manner that can leverage high-throughput single-cell sequencing data.
resultsIn this work, we develop a chemical master equation model reference library-based computational pipeline to infer kinetic parameters describing noisy mRNA distributions from single-cell RNA sequencing data, using the commonly applied stochastic telegraph model. The approach fits kinetic parameters via steady-state distributions, as measured across a population of cells in snapshot data. Our pipeline also serves as a tool for comprehensive analysis of parameter identifiability, in both a priori (studying model properties in the absence of data) and a posteriori (in the context of a particular dataset) use-cases. The pipeline can perform both of these tasks, i.e. inference and identifiability analysis, in an efficient and scalable manner, and also serves to disentangle contributions to uncertainty in inferred parameters from experimental noise versus structural properties of the model. We found that for the telegraph model, the majority of the parameter space is not practically identifiable from single-cell RNA sequencing data, and low experimental capture rates worsen the identifiability. Our methodological framework could be extended to other data types in the fitting of small biochemical network models. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All code relevant to this work is available at https://github.com/Read-Lab-UCI/TelegraphLikelihoodInfer, archival DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16915450.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.