ReviewBioelectronic medicine2025
The auditory nerve implant-concept and device description of a novel electrical auditory prosthesis.
Review in Bioelectronic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards model-based characterization of individual electrically stimulated nerve fibers.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Pilot Chronic Evaluation of a Slanted Electrode Array as an Auditory Nerve Implant.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
- Correction: The auditory nerve implant-concept and device description of a novel electrical auditory prosthesis.Bioelectronic medicine · 2025Article
- Development of a non-human primate model for preclinical research of a novel auditory nerve implant.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cochlear implant (CI) is considered one of the most successful neural prostheses, enabling deaf individuals to achieve intelligible speech perception. However, CI performance remains limited in noise and with complex acoustic scenes, including music and multi-talker speech. One major issue for CIs is the poor electrode-neural interface where electrodes are positioned within the bony cochlea and distant from the auditory nerve fibers. Due to recent advances with microelectrode technologies designed for peripheral nerves, there has been rekindled interest in the auditory nerve implant (ANI), in which a novel prosthesis with a microelectrode array has been developed for direct stimulation of the auditory nerve. Animal studies demonstrate that the ANI achieves substantially lower thresholds and more selective neural activation compared to CI stimulation, which could lead to greater hearing performance. To successfully translate the ANI to patients, the ANI device components need to be further designed for safe and reliable implantation in humans through development of alternative surgical techniques, and validated in chronic animal studies. New stimulation strategies also need to be developed, especially with the potential to insert tens to hundreds of microelectrodes across the spiraling tonotopy of the auditory nerve to activate more spatially and temporally distinct nerve fiber patterns than is possible with the CI. Once in humans, extensive perceptual experiments can be performed with the ANI to characterize thresholds, loudness growth functions, pitch patterns, temporal coding properties, and spectral selectivity, as well as evaluating novel stimulation strategies that will guide the development of the next generation ANI system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.