ArticleSystematic reviews2025
Impact of electronic cigarette use on the oral microbiome: a protocol for a systematic review of clinical studies.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Electronic Cigarette Use on the Oral Microbiota: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2026Pooled it
- A Narrative Review on the Impact of ENDS Use on Clinical, Inflammatory and Microbiological Periodontal-Related Parameters.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe oral microbiome plays a pivotal role in maintaining both oral and systemic health, yet it can be disrupted by lifestyle factors such as tobacco use. Electronic cigarette (e-cig) has emerged as a popular alternative to conventional smoking, often perceived as a harm reduction tool. While combustible tobacco smoking is known to promote pathogenic shifts in the oral microbiota, evidence on the impact of e-cig use remains limited and inconsistent. A systematic synthesis of current evidence is therefore warranted to assess the potential microbiological and clinical implications of e-cig use. This systematic review aims to critically evaluate clinical studies assessing the effects of e-cig use on the oral microbiome, with specific comparisons to current smokers and never smokers.
methodsPubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science have been searched from 2010 up to August 27, 2025, using MeSH terms and free-text keywords related to e-cigs, vaping, oral microbiome, and microbial diversity. Eligible studies will include randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional, and longitudinal observational designs comparing e-cig users with current smokers and/or never smokers, and using culture-independent, next-generation sequencing techniques for microbiome profiling. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Given expected heterogeneity, findings will be synthesized narratively and tabulated; subgroup analyses will examine differences according to oral health status, e-cig use patterns, and sampling site.
resultsDatabase searching was completed on Aug 27, 2025, and identified 39 records in PubMed, 46 in Scopus, and 83 in Web of Science. Secondary searches, including gray literature screening and snowballing, have not yet been conducted. Screening and selection of retrieved articles are in progress, with review completion expected by November 2025. DISCUSSION: This review is expected to provide a comprehensive and critical appraisal of the current evidence on the relationship between e-cig use and oral microbiome composition. By summarizing key microbial diversity patterns, identifying taxa-level differences, and highlighting methodological strengths and limitations, it will clarify the extent to which e-cig use may influence oral microbial communities. The anticipated heterogeneity in study designs, outcome measures, and sampling methods underscores the need for cautious interpretation and for standardization in future research. The findings aim to inform clinical understanding of potential local and systemic implications of e-cig use and to guide the design of robust, longitudinal studies with careful control of residual confounding. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration: CRD420251120281.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.