Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41131624›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025

Unequal budgeting and limited WHO AWaRe Access antibiotics in Punjab: procurement policy gaps in Pakistan's National Action Plan against antimicrobial resistance.

Shairyar Afzal, Mishal Bajwa, Mian Shahzeb Haroon, Huda Arooj, Rana Muhammad Zahid Mushtaq, Zikria Saleem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shairyar AfzalDepartment of Pharmacy, DHQ Hospital Jhelum, Jhelum, Pakistan. mirzashairyar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8733-1748
Mishal BajwaDepartment of Pharmacy, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9601-2692
Mian Shahzeb HaroonDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8531-8081
Huda AroojDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5517-8512
Rana Muhammad Zahid MushtaqInstitute for Regeneration and Repair (IRR), Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-0177
Zikria SaleemDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia. s.zaikria@qu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3202-6347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProcurement-side stewardship - unaddressed by Pakistan's National Action Plan (NAP) against antimicrobial resistance (AMR) - is critical in ensuring access to needed antibiotics to curb AMR. However, a fragmented procurement model, disconnected from updated clinical evidence and inconsiderate towards budgetary allocation, is being implemented in Pakistan, affecting access to antibiotics. This study seeks to understand the implications of the current procurement policy on access to antibiotics.

methodThis study offers a descriptive content analysis of the Standard Medicine List (SML), a procurement policy currently implemented in Punjab's primary and secondary healthcare facilities (PSHFs). Using procurement data from one of the DHA's of Rawalpindi division and budget appropriation documents from the fiscal year (FY) 2023-2024, we evaluated the total cost, defined daily dose (DDDs), and cost per DDD of procured antibiotics in Punjab. We also measured the percentage of spending on antibiotics for the secondary care sector.

resultsOur analysis includes 2970 PSHFs of Punjab. Our findings suggest that SML does not ensure consistent access to antibiotics because budgetary allocations do not correspond with SML-advised quantities. If the SML-advised quantities were procured, 85% of the PSHFs' medicine budget would be consumed; however, for primary care solely, 122.5% of the medicine budget is required to procure antibiotics as per SML-indicated quantities. The total Access category DDDs procured in Punjab as per SML-advised quantities is only 44%. Furthermore, key Access category antibiotics, such as Amoxicillin, are subject to conditional procurement or are missing entirely. Overall, SML promoted the WHO AWaRe Watch category antibiotic use, with ceftriaxone being the most procured antibiotic, consuming 20.7% (1.41 billion PKR) of the total budget spending as per SML-advised quantity.

conclusionSML is misaligned with the core concept of the WHO AWaRe system and the recent UNGA target of 70% Access category antibiotic consumption. The study elucidates that PSHFs lack sufficient funds to procure SML-advised quantities, highlighting its incompatibility with the budgetary grant, which affects consistent access to antibiotics. There is a need to recalibrate the procurement policy and leverage Pakistan's NAP to propagate a national antibiotic procurement framework to restrain AMR.

Indexed as

Antibiotic accessAntibiotic procurement policyAntibiotic resistanceAntibioticsAntimicrobial resistance (AMR)Antimicrobial stewardshipNational action plan (NAP)WHO AWaRe

Identifiers

PMID41131624
PMCPMC12548248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.