Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41131601›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Risks posed by nurses' working hours in the intensive care unit: a systematic review.

Beratiye Oner, Fadik Cokelek, Nurcan Calıskan, Sergul Duygulu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beratiye OnerFaculty of Nursing, Lokman Hekim University, Ankara, Turkey. beratiye.oner@lokmanhekim.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8004-4657
Fadik CokelekQuality Management Directorate, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Nurcan CalıskanFaculty of Nursing, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey. nurcany@gazi.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4611-2230
Sergul DuyguluFaculty of Nursing, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses in intensive care units often work long shifts, leading to significant physical and mental strain. This strain can negatively impact their well-being and the quality of care they provide to patients.

aimTo evaluate the associations between nurses' working hours in intensive care units and outcomes related to risk identification, nurse well-being, patient safety, and institutional performance.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted under the methodological guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute, grounded in a theoretical framework based on the Donabedian Model, and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. Literature searches were conducted from 2014 to 2024, with the assistance of an expert librarian, across the databases of Scopus, Medline/PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Peer-reviewed empirical or primary studies, published in English or Turkish, focused on nurses working in adult intensive care units, addressed risks related to working hours, utilized experimental, quasi-experimental, cross-sectional, or longitudinal designs, and regression analysis methods to explore associations and predictive outcomes were included. Publications not in English or Turkish, lack of full-text access, grey literature, studies on official sections of the intensive care units, and studies not focusing on the risks of growth along with the working hours of officials in the intensive care units were excluded.

resultsA total of 902 articles were identified, and 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis suggests that extended working hours in intensive care units pose significant risks, particularly related to sleep disturbances, increased burnout, and medication errors. These risks affect nurses, patients, and institutions alike.

conclusionThe review highlights the importance of addressing the risks associated with long working hours in intensive care units. The primary risks identified include nurse-focused issues such as the development of sleep disturbances and increased burnout, as well as patient-focused risks like medication errors. These risks, along with their frequency and impact, underscore the need for improved scheduling and working conditions to ensure patient safety and nurse well-being. JOANNA BRIGGS INSTITUTE (JBI) REVIEW REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered with the Open Science Framework proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute Collaboration on August 10, 2024 and is available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FTQBK. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Healthcare organizations can use these findings as a resource in creating evidence-based programs to create a healthy work environment and ensure patient safety, and to minimize existing risks in institutions.

Indexed as

Critical careIntensive careNursingRiskWork hours

Identifiers

PMID41131601
PMCPMC12551304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.