ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Creation of the European Portuguese version of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale - short form (CMPS-SF) and initial psychometric evaluation.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPain is a complex experience, associated with several medical and surgical conditions. We aimed to performed initial psychometric evaluation of the Portuguese version of the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale - Short Form (CMPS-SF). Sixty-eight dogs (27 males and 41 females) were recruited.The English version of the CMPS-SF was translated into Portuguese, and native Portuguese-speaking veterinarians completed a copy of the translated version.Pain scores from dogs that underwent soft tissue or orthopedic surgery were recorded at 2, 6, and 24 hours after endotracheal extubation. Construct validity was demonstrated by testing if pain scores decrease over time following surgery, if pain levels are associated with the severity classification of the surgical procedure, and if orthopedic procedures are associated with higher pain levels than soft tissue procedures.
resultsThe animals in the sample had a mean body weight of 23.2 ± 4.2kg and a mean age of 5.9 ± 3.1 years. Sixty-three procedures were classified as soft tissue, 5 as orthopedic, 27 as mild, and 41 as moderate. Significant differences were observed in median scores between soft tissue and orthopedic cases and between mild and moderate cases. Median pain scores decreased with time. We presented the initial validation of the European Portuguese version of the CMPS-SF in the Portuguese language. It provides clinicians with a valid tool to assess acute pain in dogs. Further studies are required to determine if the present results can be replicated across samples, submitted to a larger range of surgical procedures, and in different clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.