Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41131559›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

First aid practices about wounds and burns in rural areas: an example from western Turkey.

Müjgan Solak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Müjgan SolakFaculty of Nursing, Department of Surgical Nursing, Ege University, Izmir, 35100, Türkiye. mujgan.solak@ege.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6201-3139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional methods are still widely accepted and used by most people worldwide.

objectiveThis study was conducted to determine first-aid practices about wounds and burns in rural areas.

methodsThis cross-sectional descriptive study recruited a total of 176 people who agreed to participate. During the data collection, a questionnaire prepared by the researcher in line with the literature information was used. Analysed data are presented as percentage distributions, mean and chi-square tests.

resultsThe most frequently encountered situations requiring first aid are sharp object injuries 31.2%, blunt injuries 30.1%, burn injuries 25.5%, and sudden loss of consciousness 13.0%. About 59.1% of them used traditional practices (scrubbing, mixing cattle feces with ash, smashing olives, wrapping tarhana(traditional turkish soup) in sprain injuries. For burn injuries, 34.1% of them used traditional first-aid practices (such as applying honey, oil, yogurt etc.).

conclusionsThe results of this study indicate that the most common situations requiring first aid were injuries caused by sharp objects, blunt force trauma, and burns. Traditional methods were frequently used, particularly for closed injuries, burns, and insect bites. There is a pressing need for public education on evidence-based first-aid practices and further research into the safety and effectiveness of traditional remedies.

Indexed as

BurnsFirst AidMedicine, TraditionalRural PopulationWounds and InjuriesAdolescentAdultAgedChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyBurnsFirst aidTraditional medicineWounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID41131559
PMCPMC12548283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.