ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Prediction of postoperative haemorrhage after cerebral tumour surgery using machine learning algorithms.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional diagnostic methods used by neurosurgeons are limited in their ability to address complex interactions. These limitations have necessitated the use of advanced artificial intelligence approaches capable of analyzing multidimensional data with greater precision in neurosurgical clinics. Postoperative intracranial hemorrhage is a critical complication following cerebral tumor surgery, often associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to predict the risk of postoperative intracerebral hemorrhage in patients undergoing intracranial tumor surgery by employing machine learning (ML) algorithms for risk stratification and identifying key contributing factors.
methodsThis retrospective study included 118 patients monitored in the neurosurgical intensive care unit between January 2024 and January 2025. The primary outcome was postoperative hemorrhage, defined as a radiologically confirmed hematoma ≥ 5 ml on brain CT within 24 h. Using a predefined set of clinical and biochemical parameters analyzed with SPSS and R, multiple ML algorithms were developed. To address class imbalance in the training data, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied. Models were evaluated using metrics including Area Under the Curve (AUC), accuracy, and F1-score, with further assessment via calibration plots and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA).
resultsThe LightGBM model demonstrated a robust and balanced predictive performance, achieving a test AUC of 0.7451, an accuracy of 76.9%, a sensitivity of 77.8%, and an F1-score of 0.700. Platelet count (PLT), serum chloride (Cl), and the change in C-reactive protein from pre- to postoperative state (delta-CRP) emerged as the most influential predictors of hemorrhage. Model explainability was enhanced using SHAP and LIME analyses, and the model showed good calibration with potential clinical net benefit.
conclusionOur study suggests that ML algorithms, particularly LightGBM, show promise for predicting postoperative hemorrhage following brain tumor surgery. Biomarkers such as platelet count, chloride, and delta-CRP offer clinically meaningful insights for early risk detection. Once externally validated, the integration of such models into clinical decision support systems could potentially improve postoperative monitoring and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.