Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41131518›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

The value of second-generation gene sequencing in lung cancer immunotherapy with concurrent infections.

Yaqin Zhang, Qiangqiang Zhang, Lu Wang, Yan Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yaqin ZhangDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434000, China.
Qiangqiang ZhangDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434000, China.
Lu WangDepartment of Science and Education, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434000, China. wanglu2019@yangtzeu.edu.cn.
Yan HuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434000, China. helensparkle@163.com.

Funding

Medical and Health Talent Training Program 023YZ09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo collect clinical baseline data of patients with lung cancer and infection, explore the association between clinical characteristics and infection characteristics between the immunotherapy group and the non-immunotherapy group. At the same time, analyze the distribution of pathogens in patients, compare whether there are differences in pathogen distribution between the two groups, and thus explore the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for patients with lung cancer immunotherapy and infection.

methodsA total of 107 patients with lung cancer and infection treated at Jingzhou First People’s Hospital from December 2022 to July 2025 were included in the study. They were divided into an immunotherapy group (40 cases) and a non-immunotherapy group (67 cases) based on whether they received immunotherapy. All patients underwent electronic bronchoscopy and mNGS testing. The pathogen detection results and various clinical baseline information of the enrolled patients were collected to explore the association between infection characteristics and clinical characteristics in the two groups and to compare whether there were differences in pathogen distribution between the two groups.

resultsIn terms of clinical manifestations, the proportion of patients with fever was higher in the immunotherapy group than in the non-immunotherapy group. The length of hospital stay and hospitalization costs were higher in the immunotherapy group than in the non-immunotherapy group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). In terms of laboratory indicators, patients in the immunotherapy group had higher levels of D-dimer and inflammatory markers (CRP, PCT, IL-6) than those in the non-immunotherapy group, while albumin and hemoglobin levels were lower, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). In the immunotherapy group, 11 cases of pure bacterial infection, 0 cases of pure fungal infection, 2 cases of pure viral infection, and 25 cases of mixed infection were detected. In the non-immunotherapy group, there were 5 cases of pure bacterial infection, 6 cases of pure fungal infection, 1 case of pure viral infection, and 51 cases of mixed infection. We found that the detection rate of pure bacterial infection was higher in the immunotherapy group than in the non-immunotherapy group (X² = 7.907, P = 0.005 < 0.05), with the tuberculosis bacillus infection rate significantly higher in the immunotherapy group than in the non-immunotherapy group (X² = 5.738, P = 0.017 < 0.05). Among mixed infections, the detection rate of fungal mixed infections was higher in the immunotherapy group than in the non-immunotherapy group (X² = 7.474, P = 0.006 < 0.05). with the immunotherapy group showing significantly higher infection rates for Pneumocystis jirovecii (X² = 4.292, P = 0.038 < 0.05) and Aspergillus terreus (X² = 4.485, P = 0.034 < 0.05) compared to the non-immunotherapy group, with statistically significant differences. The detection rate of mixed bacterial infections in the non-immunotherapy group was higher than that in the immunotherapy group (X² = 8.568, P = 0.003 < 0.05). The detection rates of single bacterial and viral infections, as well as other mixed infections, in the immunotherapy group were not significantly different from those in the non-immunotherapy group (P > 0.05).

conclusionThe incidence of bacterial infections and mixed fungal infections increased in lung cancer patients after immunotherapy. Among them, the detection rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and Aspergillus fumigatus were significantly higher in the immunotherapy group than in the non-immunotherapy group. The detection rate of bacterial mixed infections was higher in the non-immunotherapy group than in the immunotherapy group. In the immunotherapy group, bacterial infections were primarily caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Streptococcus pneumoniae, fungal infections were primarily caused by Aspergillus fumigatus and Pneumocystis jirovecii, and viral infections were primarily caused by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). In the non-immunotherapy group, bacterial infections were primarily caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Haemophilus influenzae, fungal infections were primarily caused by Aspergillus fumigatus, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and Aspergillus flavus, and viral infections were primarily caused by EB virus and influenza A virus H1N1. Additionally, mNGS demonstrated good applicability in the population undergoing immunotherapy for lung cancer and had a significant impact on treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingImmunotherapyLung NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedImmunotherapyLung cancerMetagenomic second-generation sequencingPathogen detectionPulmonary infection

Identifiers

PMID41131518
PMCPMC12548133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.