Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41131513›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

Denoising self-supervised learning for disease-gene association prediction.

Yan Zhang, Ju Xiang, Jianming Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ju XiangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, China. xiang.ju@foxmail.com.
Jianming LiHuman Provincial University Key Laboratory of the Fundamental and Clinical Research on Neurodegenerative Diseases, Changsha Medical University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the interplay between diseases and genes is crucial for gaining deeper insights into disease mechanisms and optimizing therapeutic strategies. In recent years, various computational methods have been developed to uncover potential disease-gene associations. However, existing computational approaches for disease-gene association prediction still face two major limitations. First, most current studies focus on constructing complex heterogeneous graphs using multi-dimensional biological entity relationships, while overlooking critical latent interaction patterns, namely, disease neighbor interactions and gene neighbor interactions-which are more valuable for association prediction. Second, in self-supervised learning (SSL), the presence of noise in auxiliary tasks commonly affects the accurate modeling of diseases and genes. In this study, we propose a novel denoising method for disease-gene association prediction, termed DGSL. To address the first issue, we utilize bipartite graphs corresponding to diseases and genes to derive disease-disease and gene-gene similarities, and further construct disease and gene interaction graphs to capture the latent interaction patterns. To tackle the second challenge, we implement cross-view denoising through adaptive semantic alignment in the embedding space, while preserving useful neighbor interactions. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseSupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsHumansDenoising self-supervised learningDisease-gene associations predictionSimilarity-guided

Identifiers

PMID41131513
PMCPMC12551132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.