SynthesisBMC geriatrics2025
Interventions to improve hip fracture guideline adherence for time to surgery and early mobilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hip Fracture Management in Older Adults in Resource-Constrained Settings: Determinants, Care Pathways, and Outcomes-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of fast-track surgical management for acute orthopedic fractures: a retrospective cohort analysis.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Systematic evaluation of the biomechanical characteristics of PFNA, PFBN, and InterTan fixation for intertrochanteric fractures under gradient variations of proximal femoral lateral wall thickness and delineation of optimal fixation domains.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Sensory processing impairments and their associations with physical and psychological outcomes in older adults after fall-related hip fracture surgery: a prospective cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Observational
- The Preoperative Waiting Time on Long-Term Survival Following Elderly Hip Fracture Surgery.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical quality registries indicate that adherence to clinical practice guidelines for the management of hip fracture patients is often not as recommended. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate interventions that improve adherence to hip fracture guideline recommendations for time to surgery and early mobilization.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of English language studies published between 1st January 2000 and 12th March 2025, available from Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science was conducted. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Studies were included if they reported on interventions designed to improve time to surgery or early mobilization in the acute care period for patients aged 50 years and older admitted to hospital with a proximal femoral fracture.
resultsTen studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions to improve time to surgery and early mobilization included care pathways (n = 5), orthogeriatric models of care (n = 2), audit and feedback (n = 1), clinical supervision (n = 1), and pay for performance (n = 1). Interventions were associated with an overall small to moderate positive effect on time to surgery (n = 6, SMD 0.47, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.80, I
conclusionInterventions to improve adherence to hip fracture clinical guidelines recommendations for time to surgery and early mobilization have the potential to yield small to moderate improvements in both time to surgery and early mobilization after surgery. However, caution should be exercised when interpreting these findings due to the presence of heterogeneity between studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.