ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Care at home for remdesivir treatment of COVID-19: a survey study of patient and physician experiences.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, remdesivir (RDV) treatment and advanced medical care at home (AMCAH) were pivotal implementations for delivery of comprehensive outpatient services.
methodsA retrospective survey study was conducted to assess patient and physician experiences of RDV treatment. The online/telephone survey questionnaire was developed based on components of the Health Belief Model, Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers (HCAHPS), and physician change management theory. Patients ≥ 18 years of age (N = 1681) who received a three- or five-day RDV treatment regimen at home and prescribing physicians (N = 406) from December 15, 2020-August 31, 2022, in a large integrated non-profit health system were eligible. A cross-sectional analysis was performed to assess the associations of perceptions about value with patient adherence to 100% of prescribed doses, physician adoption of treatment guidelines, and patients’ healthcare utilization. Reduction in COVID-19 related readmission within 30 days of entry into treatment program was also measured. Descriptive statistics were used to describe categorical responses.
resultsOf survey results from 539 patient respondents (response rate: 32%, mean age: 58.4 years (SD 16.2), 55.1% male), race/ethnicity was predominantly Hispanic (48.4%), followed by White (32.3%), and Black (12.6%). Adherence was 87% of patients having completed 100% of RDV doses at home. Patients (79.9%) reporting being “very satisfied” with medical follow-up were less frequently readmitted within 30 days (p < 0.01). Of 140 physician respondents (response rate: 34%, mean age: 46.9 years (SD 8.4), 58% male), race/ethnicity was predominantly Asian (66%), followed by White (23%), and Hispanic (7.1%). Prescribing was associated with feeling knowledgeable about RDV (p < 0.01) and perceived effectiveness for reducing community transmission (p = 0.03).
conclusionsIn racially diverse samples, patients and physicians responded favorably towards AMCAH integrating RDV for treatment of COVID-19. Easy to understand communication and hospital readmission were found to most shape patient satisfaction. AMCAH during the pandemic demonstrated that acute care needs of patients can be safely met at home. These findings inform future design of health care delivery and support expansion for treatment of other acute illnesses. KEY POINTS: QUESTION: What were patient and physician responses to advanced medical care at home integrating RDV for treatment of COVID-19?
findingsIn this survey study, majority of eligible patients (87%) completed 100% home RDV. Patients reported physicians most influenced their decision to accept treatment (70.7%) and high satisfaction with telehealth (95.8%). Patients who reported being “very satisfied” with medical follow-up (81.8%) were less frequently readmitted within 30 days (p<0.01). Physician prescribing of RDV was associated with knowledge (p<0.01) and perceived effectiveness for reducing community transmission (p=0.03). Most physicians reported confidence in nurse capacity (88.2%) and pharmacy services (96.3%) to support care at home.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.