ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Effect of ayres sensory integration
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study examined the effects of Ayres Sensory Integration ® (ASI) -based occupational therapy intervention on sensory processing in a 12-month-old boy with Trisomy 4p and Monosomy 10q. CASE PRESENTATION: Sensory processing was assessed using the Test of Sensory Functions in Infants (TSFI) before and after a 24-week intervention consisting of twice-weekly, 45-minute individualized ASI ® sessions conducted by a certified occupational therapist. Increases in raw scores were observed across all TSFI subdomains and the total score. Improvements were observed in raw scores across all TSFI subdomains and in the total score. Notably, visual-tactile integration and oculomotor control showed measurable improvement, shifting from the “abnormal” to the “at-risk” range. However, other subdomains remained within the “abnormal” classification, and the overall TSFI classification continued to indicate sensory processing difficulties.
conclusionsAlthough positive changes were observed in the child’s responses and abilities following the intervention, the severity of his sensory processing challenges indicates a need for ongoing long-term therapeutic support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.