Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41131492›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Exploring feasibility of health-related quality of life assessments and pain diaries in patients undergoing prehabilitation before total knee arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Pascale Gränicher, Michel Kocher, Rob de Bie, Jaap Swanenburg, Johannes Scherr

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05314985 (Effect of Preoperative Training and Education on Pre- and Postoperative Functional Performance in Patients Awaiting TKA; A Randomized Controlled Trial - a Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05314985 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Preoperative Training and Education on Pre- and Postoperative Functional Performance in Patients Awaiting TKA; A Randomized Controlled Trial - a Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBalgrist University HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsPrehab intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pascale GränicherDepartment of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Peter Debyeplein 1, Maastricht, 6229 HA, The Netherlands. pascale.graenicher@balgrist.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8956-4547
Michel KocherUniversity Center for Prevention and Sports Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 319, Zurich, CH-8008, Switzerland.
Rob de BieDepartment of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Peter Debyeplein 1, Maastricht, 6229 HA, The Netherlands.
Jaap SwanenburgIntegrative Spinal Research ISR, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, Zurich, 8008, Switzerland.
Johannes ScherrUniversity Center for Prevention and Sports Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 319, Zurich, CH-8008, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrehabilitation prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may mitigate deterioration in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during the preoperative period and support recovery after surgery. However, little is known about the feasibility of systematically monitoring HRQOL and pain through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in this context. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using validated HRQOL questionnaires and daily pain diaries during a prehabilitation programme for patients awaiting (TKA) and up to 12 weeks postoperatively.

methodsTwenty patients (mean age 73 ± 6 years) scheduled for primary unilateral TKA were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) or control group (CG). The IG participated in a 4- to 8-week individualised prehabilitation programme involving exercise and education. Feasibility was assessed through the completion rates of daily pain diaries and three HRQOL questionnaires (EQ-5D-5 L, SF-12 and KOOS KRQOL) collected at baseline, preoperatively, and at 6- and 12-weeks postoperatively.

resultsHRQOL questionnaires demonstrated high completion rates across both groups (90%). In contrast, adherence to paper-based pain diaries was suboptimal and notably low (CG: 58%; IG: 47%), falling below the threshold for meaningful analysis. Consequently, pain trajectory over time could not be reliably assessed. No significant group-by-time interaction effects were observed for any HRQOL measure: EQ-5D-5 L (p = 0.67; F = 0.51), KOOS KRQOL (p = 0.72; F = 0.64), SF-12 PCS (p = 0.06; F = 0.50) and MCS (p = 0.36; F = 0.10).

conclusionThis pilot study confirms the feasibility and acceptability of HRQOL questionnaires in older patients undergoing prehabilitation before TKA. However, the low diary completion rates highlight the need for alternative pain-monitoring-approaches - such as electronic formats - to improve data quality in future trials. Preliminary findings suggest potential benefits of prehabilitation, warranting further investigation in larger studies.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier; NCT05314985. Registered 20 July 2021. BASEC-Nr. 2020-03060.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneePain MeasurementPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPreoperative CarePreoperative ExerciseQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesFeasibility studiesHealth diariesHealth-Related quality of lifePrehabilitationTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41131492
PMCPMC12548121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.