Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41131464›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

Computationally efficient multi-sample flow cytometry data analysis using Gaussian mixture models.

Philip Rutten, Tim R Mocking, Jacqueline Cloos, Wessel N van Wieringen, Costa Bachas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philip RuttenDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.rutten@amsterdamumc.nl.
Tim R MockingDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline CloosDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wessel N van WieringenEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Costa BachasDepartment of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.bachas@amsterdamumc.nl.

Funding

Stichting Cancer Center Amsterdam CCA2020-9-68
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn important challenge in flow cytometry (FCM) data analysis is making comparisons of corresponding cell populations across multiple FCM samples. An interesting solution is creating a statistical mixture model for multiple samples simultaneously, as such a multi-sample model can characterize a heterogeneous set of samples, and facilitates direct comparison of cell populations across the data samples. The multi-sample approach to statistical mixture modeling has been explored in a number of reports, mostly within a Bayesian framework and with high computational complexity. Although these approaches are effective, they are also computationally demanding, and therefore do not relate well to the requirement of scalability, which is essential in the multi-sample setting. This limits their utility in the analysis of large sets of large FCM samples.

resultsWe show that basic Gaussian mixture models can be extended to large data sets consisting of multiple samples, using a computationally efficient implementation of the expectation-maximization algorithm. We show that the multi-sample Gaussian mixture model (MSGMM) is competitive with other models, in both rare cell detection and sample classification accuracy. This allows us to further explore the utility of MSGMMs in the analysis of heterogeneous sets of samples. We demonstrate how simple heuristics on MSGMM model output can directly reveal structural patterns in a collection of FCM samples.

conclusionsWe recover the efficiency and utility of the basic MSGMM which underlies more complex and non-parametric Bayesian hierarchical mixture models. The possibility of fitting GMMs to large sets of FCM samples provides opportunities for the discovery of associations between sample composition and sample meta-data such as treatment responses and clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyFlow CytometryModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansNormal DistributionClassificationClusteringEM algorithmFlow cytometryGaussian mixture modelsLarge-scale data

Identifiers

PMID41131464
PMCPMC12551185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.