ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025
Reconstruction of pectoral musculature in non-avialan paravians and basal birds: implications in the acquisition of flapping flight.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies analyzed the origin of flapping birds, but only a few of them explored the scapular girdle myology in early birds and non-avian paravians. We analyze the pectoral girdle morphology in different groups of non-ornithothoracine paravians with the aim to hypothesize the anchorage sites of selected pectoral muscles and determine their main functions in forelimb movements. Notably, the pectoral girdle remained morphologically stable among non-ornithothoracine paravians since certain aspects of the coracoid and scapula are similar in non-flying taxa, such as the cursorial Buitreraptor, as well as those with the ability to fly, such as the four-winged Microraptor, the long-tailed Archaeopteryx and the pygostylians Confuciusornis and Sapeornis. The distinctions among these taxa are slightly discernible in bone morphology, but they are obvious in the forelimbs feather coverage. In this sense, main pectoral muscles (i.e., mm. supracoracoideus, pectoralis and deltoideus scapularis/major) had similar origin and insertion places, and their inferred functions were similar across a wide array of body shapes of early paravians. The most significant muscular changes occurred in the common ancestor of Pygostylia, and consisted in the displacement of the origin of the mm. biceps brachii and coracobrachialis p. cranialis, accompanying the greater development of the acrocoracoid process and the loss of the subglenoid fossa. These modifications allowed more muscles to participate in humeral protraction and in the maintenance of wing extension. Subsequently, in the Ornithothoraces node, coracoid transformations contributed to the medial reorientation of the supracoracoidal canal thus allowing the m. supracoracoideus to fulfill a wing elevation function. Our study suggests that in non-ornithothoracine paravians, the main movements of the forelimb (either fliers or not) were predominantly craniodorsal to caudoventral. The humeral movements were performed in a similar manner, in which the main elevators were the mm. deltoideus and latissimus dorsi group, while the mm. supracoracoideus and pectoralis would have acted as protractor and depressor, respectively. Therefore, the ability to maintain a continuous flapping flight present in extant volant birds may have been acquired at the Ornithothoraces node, while Archaeopterygidae, Confuciusornithidae and Omnivoropterygidae may have had functional flight, short in duration and space displacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.