ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
The role and challenges of clinical research coordinators: insights from a national survey.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Clinical Trial Efficiency and Data Accuracy through Direct EHR-to-EDC Integration.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Evolving roles of Data Coordinating Centers in multisite research: Challenges and adaptations from a rapid scoping review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical research coordinators (CRCs) play a vital role in the management and execution of clinical trials, particularly in oncology and hematology.
methodsThis survey-based study, conducted by the Italian Group of Data Managers and Clinical Research Coordinators (GIDMcrc), explores the responsibilities, job satisfaction and training needs of CRCs across Italy.
results171 professionals from 20 Italian regions participated in the survey. The results indicate that CRCs predominantly engage in data management, monitoring and regulatory tasks, with significant involvement in activities such as patient registration, data entry and compliance with ethical requirements. However, discrepancies between actual job responsibilities and formal job descriptions were common, leading to reported dissatisfaction regarding workload and training adequacy. Despite the challenges faced, the majority of respondents expressed overall job satisfaction, although just under half of respondents are considering transitions to Clinical Research Organizations (CROs) or pharmaceutical companies due to better opportunities.
conclusionsThis study highlights the critical need for clearer job definitions and enhanced training programs for CRCs to improve their effectiveness and job satisfaction within the evolving landscape of clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.