ArticleDermatology and therapy2026
Anchored Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of the Long-Term Maintenance of Efficacy of Tralokinumab and Lebrikizumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Durability Index for Atopic Dermatitis: Indirect Comparison of Lebrikizumab, Dupilumab, and Tralokinumab in Maintaining Efficacy Under Variable Treatment Adherence.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor Regarding "Anchored Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of the Long-Term Maintenance of Efficacy of Tralokinumab and Lebrikizumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis".Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- A Response to: "Letter to the Editor Regarding 'Anchored Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of the Long-Term Maintenance of Efficacy of Tralokinumab and Lebrikizumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis'".Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Comparative Data on Long-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Moderate-to-Severe AD: An Expert Perspective on Using Indirect Comparison Methodology.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Review
- Atopic Dermatitis Beyond the Skin Barrier: Precision Medicine Approaches to Immunological Profiling and Therapeutic Innovation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease largely driven by interleukin (IL)-13, which is targeted by tralokinumab and lebrikizumab. Effective, long-term treatments are needed, and head-to-head studies comparing these available therapeutics have yet to be conducted. This analysis indirectly compared the maintenance of efficacy of tralokinumab and lebrikizumab at week 52 in week-16 responders.
methodsAn anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison was performed using individual patient data (IPD) from the ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2 tralokinumab trials and aggregate data from the ADvocate 1 and ADvocate 2 lebrikizumab trials, with IPD weighted to match ADvocate baseline and week-16 characteristics. Week-16 responders, patients achieving 75% reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) or Investigator Global Assessment 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1) with an ≥ 2-point improvement from baseline, were re-randomized to active treatment every 2 weeks (Q2W), every 4 weeks (Q4W), or placebo Q2W for the 36-week maintenance period. Week 52 efficacy outcomes included IGA 0/1, EASI-75, 90% reduction in EASI (EASI-90), EASI percentage improvement, and pruritus numerical rating scale 4-point improvement (pruritus 4pt) from baseline. Response differences relative to placebo for endpoints of interest were calculated between tralokinumab and lebrikizumab for Q2W and Q4W dosing to compare maintenance of efficacy at week 52 among week 16-responders.
resultsDifferences in efficacy endpoints between tralokinumab and lebrikizumab were not statistically significant; within Q2W dosing, tralokinumab versus lebrikizumab response rate differences at week 52 numerically favored tralokinumab (IGA 0/1: 1.2%, EASI-75: 19.8%, EASI-90: 1.5%, EASI percentage improvement from baseline: 3.3%, pruritus 4pt: 17.6%) while Q4W differences were more variable (IGA 0/1: -20.5%, EASI-75: 15.7%, EASI-90: -8.5%, EASI percentage improvement from baseline: -0.5%, pruritus 4pt: -2.7%).
conclusionsComparable maintenance of efficacy was observed between tralokinumab and lebrikizumab after 52 weeks of treatment among patients meeting response criteria at week 16.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.