ArticleOdontology2026
Accuracy of third molar eruption for legal age estimation using the Gambier method in Lebanese subadults.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing whether an individual has reached the legal age of 18 is a complex, multifactorial process that requires the application of reliable, standardized, and reproducible methods. Among the various approaches, the assessment of third molar eruption has recently emerged as a useful preliminary tool for estimating whether an individual has reached the age of majority. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the Gambier et al. scoring system for legal age estimation based on third molar eruption in a sample of Lebanese subadult individuals. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 537 orthopantomograms (OPGs), comprising 298 males and 239 females, aged between 15 and 24 years. An increase in mean chronological age was observed with the progression of third molar eruption stages (1-3) and phases (A-D) in both sexes. Only in limited cases has a strong relationship been found between phase D and the probability that an individual is 18 years of age or older. In this Lebanese sample, phase D, which corresponds to complete emergence in the occlusal plane, was not always associated with individuals being 18 years or older: the 11.9% of males and females in this phase is above the legal age threshold. This technique may serve only as a preliminary tool for estimating the probable age of alleged minors of Lebanese origin, particularly in the context of migrant populations and child marriage contexts. Its application is recommended in accordance with the minimum age principle, as minimum age thresholds have been established for each stage and phase of third molar eruption. This method, however, ought to be applied only in combination with other internationally validated dental age estimation methods, thereby safeguarding against potential ethical implications associated with legal age assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.