ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2026
Complications of penile augmentation: A narrative review of injectables, implants, and surgical grafts.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Penile skin necrosis after complex penile surgery with synthetic grafts: a case report.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Advanced genital reconstructive surgery: evolving techniques, expanding indications and future directions.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile augmentation procedures are controversial, primarily because most men seeking these interventions have penile dimensions within the normal range, and due to the associated risks of severe complications. This narrative review explores the effects of foreign body implantations and injections in the penis. Retrospective case series reveal the use of unapproved oil-based substances injected in non-sterile conditions, leading to sclerosing lipogranuloma and requiring complex treatments such as tissue excision and skin transplantation. The prevalence of this practice is unknown. Retrospective reports of foreign body implantation for enhancing sexual pleasure highlight complications such as pain, erosion, inflammation, nodules, skin ulcer, necrosis, penile deformity, gangrene and even death. In contrast, prospective studies on Hyaluronic acid filler injections show that these are better tolerated, however the follow-up period is short. Retrospective series of graft implantation reported improvement in penile girth and patient satisfaction; however, it had a negative impact on penile length. Silicone implants, examined in prospective cohorts carry risks of infection, erosion, seroma and necrosis, resulting in some cases of severe penile deformities and are associated with a removal rate of up to 10%. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for men requesting penile augmentation, and further research is needed to successfully manage patients seeking these procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41131408What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.