Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41131408›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2026

Complications of penile augmentation: A narrative review of injectables, implants, and surgical grafts.

Mahmood Ramazan, Louise Faurholt Øbro, Majken Højrup Wiborg, Mikkel Fode, Christian Fuglesang S Jensen, Palle Jörn Sloth Osther, Grzegorz Fojecki

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mahmood RamazanDepartment of Urology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Louise Faurholt ØbroDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Center, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-9479
Majken Højrup WiborgDepartment of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Mikkel FodeDepartment of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8963-4581
Christian Fuglesang S JensenDepartment of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7810-1413
Palle Jörn Sloth OstherDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Center, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark. Palle.Joern.Osther@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7962-1640
Grzegorz FojeckiDepartment of Urology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Penile augmentation procedures are controversial, primarily because most men seeking these interventions have penile dimensions within the normal range, and due to the associated risks of severe complications. This narrative review explores the effects of foreign body implantations and injections in the penis. Retrospective case series reveal the use of unapproved oil-based substances injected in non-sterile conditions, leading to sclerosing lipogranuloma and requiring complex treatments such as tissue excision and skin transplantation. The prevalence of this practice is unknown. Retrospective reports of foreign body implantation for enhancing sexual pleasure highlight complications such as pain, erosion, inflammation, nodules, skin ulcer, necrosis, penile deformity, gangrene and even death. In contrast, prospective studies on Hyaluronic acid filler injections show that these are better tolerated, however the follow-up period is short. Retrospective series of graft implantation reported improvement in penile girth and patient satisfaction; however, it had a negative impact on penile length. Silicone implants, examined in prospective cohorts carry risks of infection, erosion, seroma and necrosis, resulting in some cases of severe penile deformities and are associated with a removal rate of up to 10%. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for men requesting penile augmentation, and further research is needed to successfully manage patients seeking these procedures.

Indexed as

Penile ImplantationPenile ProsthesisPenisPostoperative ComplicationsDermal FillersHumansMaleProstheses and ImplantsDermal Fillers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.