ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025
An integrated MRI-based diagnostic framework for glioma with incomplete imaging sequences and imperfect annotations.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A functionally guided fusion Vision Transformer for predicting IDH status in gliomas: a multicenter study with external validation and incomplete multimodal evaluation.Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- PF-CMNet: Progressive Frequency-Aware Cross-Modal Network with Missing-Modality Distillation for 3D Brain Tumor Segmentation.Brain sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contemporary glioma diagnosis integrates molecular features (e.g., IDH, 1p/19q) with histopathology to guide clinical decision-making. However, divergent imaging protocols and variable molecular testing standards across institutions result in pervasive data heterogeneity in multi-center studies. These inconsistencies manifest as incomplete imaging sequences and missing annotations, hindering the development of robust AI-driven diagnostic frameworks. To address this, we propose SSL-MISS-Net (Self-Supervised Learning with MIssing-label encoding and Semantic Synthesis), a unified framework that simultaneously tackles input-side modality incompleteness via cross-modal self-supervised learning and output-side annotation deficiencies through a missing-label synergistic strategy, thereby reducing reliance on complete data. To our knowledge, this is the first study to jointly address both challenges, effectively unlocking the diagnostic potential of imperfect clinical data. We evaluated SSL-MISS-Net with five-fold cross-validation and two independent test sets on multi-center cohorts (six in-house datasets, three public repositories; N = 2238). Compared with sub-optimal methods AHI, SSL-MISS-Net achieved significant accuracy gains of 4% (validation) and 10% (test) for integrated glioma diagnosis. Moreover, the framework expanded the amount of clinically usable data by 256% and consistently outperformed state-of-the-art methods trained on complete data. These results demonstrate SSL-MISS-Net's clinical translatability and exceptional resilience to data imperfections in neuro-oncology AI diagnostics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.