ArticleScientific reports2025
Uniplanar aquatic exercise quantified with inertial sensors and pose estimation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a concurrent validity analysis of two measurement techniques for quantifying uniplanar human movement during aquatic exercise. Established marker-based biomechanical motion capture systems are labour intensive, and command significant prices, limiting their accessibility in non-specialist environments. Therefore, this study assesses the applicability of alternate measurement methods; inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors and markerless computer vision (CV) tracking in the form of pose estimation, applied to the quantification and analysis of aquatic exercise. This analysis establishes the validity of each method by deriving several performance-related metrics; range of motion, duration, and angular velocity, of uniplanar aquatic exercise repetitions. Using the proposed methods it was observed that each performance metric demonstrated excellent agreement (ICC ≥ 0.94) across methods, based on intraclass correlation coefficients in 20 healthy young adults (n = 9 women, aged 20-26). This analysis encompassed two exercise types, knee flexion-extension and hip flexion-extension. The authors highlight that this contribution represents a step toward establishing robust, accessible methods for objective exercise quantification in aquatic settings, where previously there has been an absence of convenient technical solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.