ArticleNeurology and therapy2025
Clinical Status, Treatment, and Disease Burden of Generalised Myasthenia Gravis in the Asia-Pacific.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient- and Caregiver-Reported Burden and Quality of Life in Generalised Myasthenia Gravis: A Multinational Real-World Survey in the Asia-Pacific Region.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Burden of Disease in Myasthenia Gravis: A Targeted Literature Review.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGeneralised myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a rare autoimmune disorder presenting as variable skeletal muscle weakness and fatigue. Comorbidities are common and symptoms are unpredictable and fluctuating. Many patients rely on immunosuppressive treatments including corticosteroids in their disease management, despite adverse events (AEs) associated with extended or high-dose use. We aimed to investigate clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and disease burden of patients diagnosed with gMG across the Asia-Pacific region.
methodsData were drawn from the Adelphi Real World gMG Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of neurologists and their patients with gMG in Australia, China, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, and Taiwan, from July 2023 to January 2024. Neurologists reported clinical characteristics from diagnosis, current maintenance treatment initiation, and at survey completion.
resultsNeurologists (n = 173) reported data on 407 patients with gMG. At the time of survey, mean (standard deviation) patient age was 51.5 (15.3) years and 58.2% were female. Also at survey, 77.6%, 20.1%, and 2.2% of patients had a Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class of II, III, or IV, respectively. Since diagnosis, myasthenic crises (22.5%) or exacerbations (37.2%) were reported for most patients (52.7%). Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (82.8%) and corticosteroids (69.5%) were most commonly prescribed gMG treatments at survey completion, and 65.1% of patients were not in pharmacological remission. AEs were experienced by 71.0% of those prescribed corticosteroids. Joint effects of corticosteroid dose and duration on the increased number of comorbidities and AEs was significant (p = 0.0319).
conclusionAcross the Asia-Pacific, most patients did not achieve pharmacological remission despite prescribed treatments, and experienced treatment-related AEs, indicating significant unmet clinical needs. It is suggested that corticosteroid overreliance in maintenance treatment could be associated with increases in comorbidities and AEs. Further research is needed to understand how novel treatments could impact clinical outcomes and reduce corticosteroid reliance for patients with gMG in the Asia-Pacific.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.