ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
ANAs and triple positivity effect on disease activity and sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective real-world machine learning approach.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Advancements and Novel Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Antinuclear Antibodies Predict Treatment Escalation and Biologic Switching in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Glucocorticoid reduction with baricitinib in rheumatoid arthritis refractory to prior therapies: a 24-week real-world analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThrough the integration of machine-learning approaches, we aim to assess the effect of ANA positivity and a triple-positive serological profile (RF + /ACPA + /ANA +) on disease activity and achieving sustained remission in a Colombian cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.
methodThis retrospective cohort study included adult RA patients and used clinical and serological data collected from an outpatient follow-up program. Machine learning models, including Support Vector Machines, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and K-Nearest Neighbors, were employed to predict sustained remission based on DAS28-ESR, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, and SDAI. Feature selection was performed using Shapley Additive Explanations values; cross-validation and area under the ROC curves (AUC) were used to assess model performance.
resultsTriple positivity was consistently associated with higher disease activity at baseline and 12 months of follow-up and lower rates of sustained remission compared to RF + /ACPA + /ANA-. This trend was also true when comparing ANA + vs. ANA- patients. The Random Forest model best predicted sustained remission for the different disease activity indices, with an AUC ranging from 0.815 to 0.839. Important features and their SHAP values for DAS28-ESR-based sustained remission included baseline DAS28-ESR (0.252), HAQ (0.147), TJC (0.119), BMI (0.115), age (0.108), SJC (0.095), and RF + /ACPA + /ANA + versus RF + /ACPA + /ANA- (0.021).
conclusionsANA positivity and a triple-positive serological profile are key factors in increased disease activity and poorer outcomes in RA. Furthermore, our predictive modeling results support integrating clinical data and machine learning methods to enhance individualized care and advance precision medicine in treating RA. Key Points • Triple seropositivity (RF +/ACPA +/ANA +) predicts worse disease activity and lower sustained remission in RA, highlighting its potential as a marker of more severe disease phenotypes. • ANA + patients exhibited delayed improvement and persistently higher disease activity, even when not triple-positive, suggesting a distinct role of ANA in RA pathogenesis and outcomes that warrants further attention in clinical evaluation. • Machine learning accurately predicted sustained remission using routine clinical and serological data. The Random Forest model demonstrated the best performance (AUC 0.815-0.839), identifying key predictors such as baseline DAS28-ESR, HAQ, and triple seropositivity, and underscoring the potential of AI in clinical decision support. • CDAI-based analyses revealed clearer distinctions between serological subgroups and more accurately reflected disease trajectories, reinforcing its value as a sensitive, accessible, and patient-centered index, especially in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41131214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.