ArticleScientific reports2025
A method for instrumental seismic intensity assessment in Western China based on RF and MLP.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Instrumental seismic intensity acts as a quantitative measure of seismic impacts, as detected by monitoring instruments. In this study, an effective and accurate model has been developed to evaluate this intensity, using a dataset consisting of 159 seismic records collected from western China. A gray correlation analysis technique is applied to establish relationships between different ground motion parameters and macro-intensity. The parameters with strong correlation coefficients are determined as the input of the machine learning model, including Clough SI, peak ground acceleration, root-mean-square acceleration, effective peak acceleration, effective peak velocity, Housner SI, peak acceleration response spectrum, peak velocity response spectrum, and cumulative absolute velocity, and the macro intensity is specified as the expected output.By leveraging machine learning algorithms, specifically the multilayer perceptron (MLP) and random forest (RF) within the TensorFlow framework, this model illuminates the relationships among the input parameters. The efficacy of the model is assessed using accuracy, mean square error (MSE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Subsequent validation with a test set emphasizes the robustness of the model, particularly highlighting the strong correlation between Clough SI and PGA with macro survey intensity. Comparative analysis with traditional methods indicates that the proposed machine learning algorithms improve accuracy rates, with RF and MLP models achieving accuracies of 79.17% and 72.92%. In particular, the RF model exhibits superior performance in terms of accuracy, MSE, and MAPE, demonstrating its higher stability and precision in assessing seismic intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.