ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
Association of Immunogenicity and Drug Exposure and the Importance of Target Engagement in ADA Development: A Clinical Case Study of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Biotherapeutics.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The administration of therapeutic proteins, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) may result in the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA), but there is limited publicly available data for biotherapeutics with exogenous targets or with targets in low abundance systemically. ADAs can impact a biotherapeutic's safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics, so evaluation of immunogenicity is required for all therapeutic proteins. This analysis sought to evaluate the immunogenicity of two mAbs against COVID-19, casirivimab (CAS) and imdevimab (IMD) administered as a cocktail (CAS + IMD), in multiple clinical trials across different participant populations to add knowledge about the immunogenicity risk of protein therapeutics against exogenous targets and the association between immunogenicity and drug exposure. Overall, the incidence of treatment-boosted and treatment-emergent ADAs and neutralizing antibodies in both disease treatment and prophylaxis settings were low (i.e., < 11%). Participants in these studies were followed for up to 225 days post-last dose. Over time, the incidence of treatment-emergent and treatment-boosted immunogenicity for each mAb increased, but the rates and titers remained low overall; when it developed, patients usually developed ADA to both mAbs. Frequency of administration, dose, and route of administration did not appear to impact rates of immunogenicity. Concentrations of CAS and IMD were similar between participants of different immunogenicity status, indicating immunogenicity of CAS and IMD had no impact on pharmacokinetics of these mAbs; there was also no observed impact on safety or efficacy. The data presented here may provide supportive information for assessing the immunogenicity risk of protein therapeutics with exogenous targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41131208What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.