Trial reportScientific reports2025
Enhancing cognition in older adults with interactive wall exergames.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interactive Wall Exergames (IWE) have been suggested as potentially effective tools for enhancing cognitive functions in older adults. However, the contribution of their different components -specifically physical, motor-cognitive, and social interactions- remains unclear. The goal was to determine whether an IWE reduced to its cognitive-motor component (IWE-) also reduced the associated cognitive benefits in comparison to IWE with incorporated aerobic and resistance exercises (IWE+). 30 healthy older adults were randomly assigned to either IWE- or IWE+, for 8 weeks, 3 times a week, during 45 min for IWE- and 75 min (45 + 30 min) for IWE+. Physical, motor, and cognitive tests were conducted before and after the training period. Secondary outcomes included the assessment of effort and enjoyment, the percentage of respondents and the magnitude of performance improvement in each group. Both groups exhibited high adherence rates (> 85%). Significant improvement in cognitive performance was detected over time in both groups, with no significant advantage of IWE- over IWE+ in terms of cognitive, physical and motor performances. No significant differences were observed in number of respondents, magnitude of performance improvement, or enjoyment levels. Overall, the findings suggest that the motor-cognitive component is the crucial part of IWE effectively enhancing cognitive performance in healthy older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.