ArticleScientific reports2025
Virtual reality reduces climate indifference by making distant locations feel psychologically close.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on gamified personality test design for wildlife conservation: integrating the theory of planned behavior and empathy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The Application of VR Technology in Engineering Issues: Geodesy and Geomatics, Mining, Environmental Protection and Occupational Safety.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined how virtual reality (VR) can reduce psychological distance to locations affected by climate change, influencing climate emotions and risk perceptions. A total of 163 students listened to a climate change news story of one of nine locations while either experiencing the location in immersive VR or viewing static images of the location. Pre- and post-test surveys revealed that VR experiences, especially for distant locations, reduced psychological distance and heightened climate frustration, reduced indifference, and increased risk perceptions compared to static images. VR also enhanced storytelling investment, measured by written story length, as well as awe and spatial presence. Political ideology moderated VR's impact on emotions and risk perceptions but not on storytelling engagement. These findings demonstrate VR's potential to make distant places feel close, foster emotional connections, alter risk perceptions, and promote climate storytelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.