ArticleScientific reports2025
Determinants of student discussion participation in the mathematical collaborative problem-solving process using PLS-SEM and FsQCA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research preparedness and competence among Nigerian medical and dental students applying for a research fellowship.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) asserts that Collaborative Problem-Solving (CPS) is an essential skill for students, also assessed in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Yet, research on how factors influence student discussion participation in the Mathematical Collaborative Problem-Solving Process remains limited. This paper integrates the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to explore factors that are related to student discussion participation during mathematical collaborative problem solving. The study collected data from 406 respondents from Guangxi, China, which has implemented collaborative problem-solving processes in recent years. The data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) approaches. The SEM results indicate that 11 out of 13 factors significantly influence discussion participation in discussions during mathematical collaborative problem solving. The fsQCA identified three solutions consisting of various combinations of elements that can lead to high student discussion participation in CPS. These fsQCA results complement the SEM findings by offering an asymmetric perspective. Together, these findings offer practical implications for mathematics teachers and school leaders. Specifically, they underscore the importance of cultivating positive attitudes, supporting students' sense of autonomy and competence, and creating classroom environments that encourage peer interaction and collective problem-solving. By applying these insights, educators can design more effective CPS activities that actively engage students and improve learning outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.