ArticleScientific reports2025
A retrospective analysis of patients with primary sinonasal adenocarcinoma underwent radiotherapy running title: radiotherapy for sinonasal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of radiotherapy in sinonasal adenocarcinoma (SNAC) remained controversial. We aimed to investigate the predictive factors and the indication of radiotherapy in SNAC patients. A monocentric, retrospective study using a primary cohort of SNAC patients who received treatment from June 2000 to December 2022. The study included 81 patients with SNAC. The survival outcomes and the prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. The application of radiotherapy was discussed. The entire cohort’s 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 75.6% and 64.3%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that T4 stage, R2 resection, orbital invasion, and without radiotherapy were poor prognostic factors. On multivariate analysis, surgical margins and radiotherapy were significantly associated with OS and PFS rates. Surgery combined with radiotherapy significantly improved the 5-year OS (66.7% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) and PFS (45.8% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.0019) rates in patients with R2 resection, not in those with R0 or R1 resection. Surgery combined with radiotherapy also was associated with significantly superior 5-year OS (73.7% vs. 46.2%, p = 0.0039) and PFS (60.6% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.013) rates compared with surgery alone in patients with T3-4 stage. Radiotherapy played an important role in the treatment of SNAC patients with R2 resection or T3-4 stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.