ArticleScientific reports2025
A new in vitro pre-clinical method for testing SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swabs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic underscored the critical role of nasopharyngeal swabbing in virus detection and containment. The urgency for mass production of swabs highlighted the necessity to evaluate their efficiency against the global shortage of medical supplies. Traditional pre-clinical swab testing methods often overlook the complexities of the nasopharyngeal anatomy and mucus properties. This study introduces an innovative in vitro pre-clinical model using a 3D-printed nasopharyngeal cavity lined with a mucus-mimicking SISMA hydrogel, to generate a novel assessment protocol for nasopharyngeal swab efficiency. Reconstructing nasopharyngeal anatomy from CT images, the model used flexible and rigid resins to simulate soft tissue and bone properties. Our evaluation compared the sample collection and release performance of experimental Heicon-type injection-molded swabs and conventional nylon flocked swabs. The Heicon swabs exhibited superior SISMA release efficiency, compared to the standard tubular model. Both swab types demonstrated lower cycle threshold (Ct) values in the tubular model, indicative of higher viral load retrievals. RT-qPCR results confirmed these differences and validated the hydrogel's suitability as a mucosa equivalent. The findings support using our nasopharyngeal model, which better simulates clinical conditions, potentially improving swab design and the reliability of viral detection assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.