ArticleScientific reports2025
Maternal microbial effects and the dynamic distribution, networks, and functions of pig gut microbiota across the entire life cycle.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of sow microbiota and developmental stages on the gut microbiome of pigs throughout their life cycle. Fecal samples using rectal swab from 30 sows and 179 piglets were collected on days 5, 35, 80, and 145. A dynamic shift in the gut microbiota was observed as the pigs progressed through different growth stages. Maternal fecal microbiota influenced the piglets' microbiota, with higher transfer rates of Escherichia-Shigella, Bacteroides, and Fusobacterium. Notably, our findings revealed that not only Bacteroides, a genus essential for breast milk digestion, but also Escherichia-Shigella and Fusobacterium, previously regarded as and assumed to be of environmental origin, in fact originated from the sow. Correlation analysis between bacterial genera and metabolic functional pathways revealed that heme biosynthesis, crucial for pregnancy maintenance, was predicted to increase in postpartum sows and was significantly associated with the presence of Acinetobacter and Campylobacter. Furthermore, potentially beneficial genera such as Butyricicoccus, Parabacteroides, Ruminiclostridium, Ruminococcus, Blautia, Prevotella, Alloprevotella, and Eubacterium were significantly correlated with energy metabolism pathways in pigs during the growing period. This study emphasizes the importance of analyzing microbial functions and networks beyond abundance alone, highlighting the potential of computational microbiome analysis to guide swine health and productivity strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.