ArticleScientific reports2025
Application of multimodal integration to develop preoperative diagnostic models for borderline and malignant ovarian tumors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malignant ovarian tumors (MOTs) and borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) differ in treatment strategies and prognosis. However, accurate preoperative diagnosis remains challenging, and improving diagnostic accuracy is crucial. We developed and validated a system using artificial intelligence (AI) to integrate machine learning (ML) models based on blood test data and deep learning (DL) models based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings to distinguish between MOT and BOT. We analyzed 78 patients with malignant serous ovarian tumors and 31 with borderline serous ovarian tumors treated at our institution. A classification model was developed using ML for blood test data, and a DL model was constructed using MRI data. By integrating these models, we developed three fusion models as multimodal diagnostic AI and compared them with standalone models. The performance was evaluated using precision, recall, and accuracy. The classification model using Light Gradient Boosting Machine achieved an accuracy of 0.825, and the DL model using Visual Geometry Group 16-layer network achieved an accuracy of 0.722 for discriminating BOT from MOT. The intermediate, late, and dense fusion models achieved accuracies of 0.809, 0.776, and 0.825, respectively. Integrating multimodal information such as blood test and imaging data may enhance learning efficiency and improve diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.