ArticleCommunications psychology2025
Revealing Key Dimensions Underlying the Recognition of Dynamic Human Actions.
Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- How are woodworking and baking represented as we walk from the workshop to the kitchen? Virtual reality environment modulates the representation of corresponding actions.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Doctor-child communication and caregivers' willingness to recommend hospital: a secondary analysis using pediatric patient experience data.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Distinct perceptual and conceptual representations of natural actions along the lateral and dorsal visual streams.Communications biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How do we understand actions performed by others? Recent studies suggest that actions can be represented as points in a multidimensional space, where the perceived similarity of two actions is thought to be related to their proximity within this space. Here we present a data-driven approach to reveal key dimensions underlying this space using a carefully selected stimulus database of 768 one-second video clips spanning 256 action categories. We gathered similarity ratings for these videos from 6,036 participants and used a computational modeling procedure to identify key dimensions underlying these ratings. This approach revealed 28 meaningful dimensions (e.g. interaction, sport and craft) which capture information concerning human actions as well as a broad range of related domains (e.g. living and non-living things). Explicit ratings of actions along these dimensions gathered in a separate group of participants revealed a high correlation between ratings and weights along these dimensions, demonstrating that these dimensions are interpretable and can be used by participants. The multidimensional action space established in the current study enables the quantification of the similarity between different actions, which will be useful for the generation of hypotheses and future experimental manipulations. Together, our results provide a window into the nature of the representations underlying the ability to interpret other people's actions and pave the way for future lines of research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.