Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41131082›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

Revealing Key Dimensions Underlying the Recognition of Dynamic Human Actions.

André Bockes, Martin N Hebart, Angelika Lingnau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

André BockesChair of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3503-2982
Martin N HebartComputational Cognitive Neuroscience and Quantitative Psychiatry, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany.
Angelika LingnauChair of Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. angelika.lingnau@ur.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8620-3009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do we understand actions performed by others? Recent studies suggest that actions can be represented as points in a multidimensional space, where the perceived similarity of two actions is thought to be related to their proximity within this space. Here we present a data-driven approach to reveal key dimensions underlying this space using a carefully selected stimulus database of 768 one-second video clips spanning 256 action categories. We gathered similarity ratings for these videos from 6,036 participants and used a computational modeling procedure to identify key dimensions underlying these ratings. This approach revealed 28 meaningful dimensions (e.g. interaction, sport and craft) which capture information concerning human actions as well as a broad range of related domains (e.g. living and non-living things). Explicit ratings of actions along these dimensions gathered in a separate group of participants revealed a high correlation between ratings and weights along these dimensions, demonstrating that these dimensions are interpretable and can be used by participants. The multidimensional action space established in the current study enables the quantification of the similarity between different actions, which will be useful for the generation of hypotheses and future experimental manipulations. Together, our results provide a window into the nature of the representations underlying the ability to interpret other people's actions and pave the way for future lines of research.

Identifiers

PMID41131082
PMCPMC12550022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.